My friend, John Jay Pittman, though not a wealthy man to begin with, built a vast and famous coin collection. He accomplished that feat by studying relentlessly, then shrewdly investing a large percentage of his limited income as a middle manager for Eastman Kodak and his wife’s income as a schoolteacher. In 1954, he mortgaged his house to travel to Egypt and bid on coins at the King Farouk Collection auction. John sacrificed his and his family’s lifestyle over the course of many decades. He passed away in 1996, with no apparent regrets, and his long-suffering family justly received the benefit of his efforts when the collection was sold at auction for over $30 million. But why did he do it?

One fervent collector of historical documents refers to his own collecting propensity as “a genetic defect”. More likely, collecting is a basic human instinct; a survival advantage amplified by eons of natural selection. Those of our ancient ancestors who managed to accumulate scarce objects may have been more prone to survive long enough to bear offspring. Even today, wealth correlates to longer life expectancy – and could any form of wealth be more basic than scarce, tangible objects?

But more relevant than the reason you happen to collect Lithuanian first day covers or 1950s romance comic books today, are your long-term goals in seeking them. Understanding your goals may help you achieve them. (more…)

By Jeff Starck COIN WORLD Staff

In determining whether a given coin has “eye appeal,” it all depends on the person you ask. To some, it’s a simple matter of taste, but to others, it’s so obvious as to have specific requirements and characteristics that a coin must meet.

The fact is, eye appeal is neither that loosely defined nor that strictly determined. The truth lies somewhere in the middle.

A definition

Without getting too far ahead of ourselves, simply put, in determining a coin’s grade, eye appeal is the element that “grabs” the viewer. Eye appeal is the overall look of a coin, according to a “coin lingo” guide at the Professional Coin Grading Service Web site.

Coin World columnist Q. David Bowers wrote in an April 9 column this year that, “eye appeal is a matter of opinion, but if a coin appears to be beautiful to your eyes, chances are good that when your collection is sold someday, buyers will feel likewise.”

In an earlier column, in the Feb. 5 issue, Bowers provides some questions to ask about a coin to determine its eye appeal. “Is the coin richly lustrous, or is it grainy or ‘greasy’ in appearance? Are there stains or spots? Is it dull gray, brown or even black? In a word, is it beautiful? Does it beckon, saying to you, ‘Buy me!’ ” Read Full Article

By Stewart Huckaby for Heritage Coin News

1986 saw the introduction of a completely new type of US coin. Actually several, if you think about it – the Walking Liberty Dollar, and the Saint-Gaudens $5, $10, $25, and $50. I’m talking, of course, about the American Eagle series of coins – the US Mint’s ultimately successful entry into the well-established market for coins as bullion. These coins contained a specific amount of a precious metal; one ounce of silver, and 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 or exactly one ounce of gold. Face values? Yes, they were visible on the coin, but neither you, I, nor anyone we know has ever spent one of these pieces.

1997 saw the introduction of the Platinum American Eagle. Again minted in 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 or one ounce sizes, these were the first and, with the exception of a single commemorative piece, currently the only platinum coins minted by the US. Face Values were a slightly more logical $10, $25, $50, and $100, although again the face value meant nothing while the metallic content of the coin meant everything. I once owned one of the one ounce pieces, having bought it at what in retrospect must have been a serious bottoming out of the market at about $370, I sold it some years later for about $650, thinking I’d made a pretty good return. And I did… until you look at the price of platinum today and realize that it’s over $1,400. Wonder if I can get this coin back for what I sold it for?

The Platinum Eagle also saw a new design concept; instead of unchanging designs for the entirety of the coin’s run, the reverse of the proof coins changed every year. I suppose the folks over at Krause would back up the notion that it is necessary to have a complete year set of proofs to technically own a type set of US bullion coins. For most of us, though, owning a single platinum piece or perhaps a piece of each denomination is sufficient for our collecting needs; I’ve since bought a tenth ounce piece, and yes it’s a proof. (more…)

Photos used with permission and courtesy of Heritage Auction Galleries

You know you have too much time on your hands when you find yourself creating an Excel spreadsheet just to calculate the total number of Buffalo nickels minted from 1913 to 1938. But you can always defend yourself by telling the world you have a good excuse.

In this day and age of so much emphasis placed on perfection, what serious collector would turn down an opportunity to own an MS or PF-70 specimen if his or her checkbook would allow it? So, if you’re a Buffalo nickel fan and haven’t been exposed to the harsh reality, you incorrectly assume that out of over 1,200,000,000 nickels (yes, that’s Billion) minted in those 25 years, mathematical probability alone would predict at least a few MS-69 or 70 specimens, wouldn’t you conclude?

But as population report after population report of the major grading services are scanned in desperation, the Buffalo fanatic is sadly resigned to the fact that in countless decades of searching, not one MS-70 has yet been recorded. Does this mean that no such specimen exists? Probably an accurate assumption. But, if one were ever found some time in the future in an obscure safe deposit box and later assigned to a major auction, can you begin to imagine how spirited the bidding would be for that coin regardless of its date and mint mark? Seven figures has such a nice ring to it (okay, maybe six.)

On further examination of these population reports and coin publications, it’s made statistically obvious that there are many year/mint mark combinations of the Buffalo nickel where the highest grade recorded goes all the way “down” to MS-65 level. Having to sadly accept these realistic maximums is the source of the article’s title.

The only solace we can get is from at least knowing why our favorite coins were evidently “doomed” to less than a “perfect” strike even as the blank planchets were about to be hit by a die with tons of pressure behind it “back in the day”. (more…)