Attorneys for ANA Ask for Release
With fewer than three weeks to go before a Sept. 25 trial on the merits, chaos has been introduced to the legal proceedings brought by Christopher Cipoletti and the American Numismatic Association against its former computer services vendor, John Nebel of Computer Systems Design, and several former ANA employees that include former comptroller Wayne Abraham, museum curator Larry Lee and Information Technology director Barbara (Susie) Nulty.
The ANA’s attorney has withdrawn and the trial has been postponed until January 2008.
The law firm of Davis Graham and Stubbs LLP, and as the filed motion papers say, “(including Janet Savage, Sybil Kisken and Stephanie Ries),” have applied to the Colorado District Court “for an order permitting them to withdraw as attorneys” for the ANA and Cipoletti.
From the inception of the suit in July 2005 until August of this year — more than two years — Cipoletti and the ANA have both been represented by Janet Savage, a partner in the Davis, Graham law firm. As she explained in a court-filed document dated Aug. 30, Savage “undertook the representation of plaintiffs [ANA and Cipoletti] pursuant to Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 1.13(e), which ‘recognizes that a lawyer for an organization may also represent a principal officer or major shareholder.’
![]()
Related Articles
- ANA Lawsuit Heads to Court
- RIFT WITH FIRED EXEC LEAVES DEBT QUESTIONS
- ANA Board Fires Executive Director Christopher Cipoletti
- ANA resolves litigation with Nebel, former employees
- Cipoletti Out As ANA Exec Director
- ANA Posts Audio File of Oct. 16th Board of Governors Meeting
- CCG Continues Relationship with ANA
- NGC Settles First Strikes Lawsuit
- Contursi, Rare Coin Wholesalers Pledge $1 Million to ANA Museum Projects
- Whiz-kid numismatist will give lecture in Carson City today
- Attorney awaits judge’s decision on sanctions
- ANA Cancels Washington, D.C. Museum Plans
- NGC reaches settlement terms
- California Supreme Court Refuses to Review Miller vs Collectors Universe
- Noe appeal calls trial, 18-year term unfair
- ANA, Contursi Amicably End Museums Project Pledge
- ANA Names Larry Shepherd Executive Director
- Fourth Annual PNG YN Scholarship Competition
- ANA Internships Available
- ANA Receives $447,095 Donation - Settlement from Francisco v. NGC Will Support Education



















Denis Herman | Sep 12, 2007 | Reply
What about those of us who have a considerable amount of money invested in coins graded as “first strike”? According to your article, dealers are not going to be interested in these. Should the grading companies not be made to re-grade these coins without the “first strike” designation and without a fee for doing so? I would like to hear your comment on that question, thank you, Denis Herman (apollo100)
CoinLink | Sep 12, 2007 | Reply
Some Dealers will still be interested in the “First Strike” coins, but any “Premium” associated with the designation will have evaporated.
I would expect that they will trade at the same levels as “Non-First Strike” coins, so changing the holder would have no effect on values, IMO.