<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Coin Design, by Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coinlink.com/News/commentary-and-opinion/great-coin-design-by-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/commentary-and-opinion/great-coin-design-by-committee/</link>
	<description>Rare Coins &#038; Currency News for Numismatic Collectors - Updated Daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/commentary-and-opinion/great-coin-design-by-committee/comment-page-1/#comment-166787</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinlink.com/News/?p=6585#comment-166787</guid>
		<description>We agree that design by committee is not the optimal way to produce attractive coins and medals.  You seem to suggest that there is another way but after you criticize the CCAC for trying you don’t suggest anything.  I would love to take your suggestions and the suggestions of your readers back to the CCAC coin design subcommittee at our meeting on Monday.

There are few people more critical of the US Mint than me, but criticism alone does not change things.  We need to offer suggestions and propose changes that can be made to the process.  Now is the time to hear it.  So please speak up.  No one has a monopoly on good ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree that design by committee is not the optimal way to produce attractive coins and medals.  You seem to suggest that there is another way but after you criticize the CCAC for trying you don’t suggest anything.  I would love to take your suggestions and the suggestions of your readers back to the CCAC coin design subcommittee at our meeting on Monday.</p>
<p>There are few people more critical of the US Mint than me, but criticism alone does not change things.  We need to offer suggestions and propose changes that can be made to the process.  Now is the time to hear it.  So please speak up.  No one has a monopoly on good ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/commentary-and-opinion/great-coin-design-by-committee/comment-page-1/#comment-164029</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinlink.com/News/?p=6585#comment-164029</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does coin design seem like it&#039;s a lost art, the new coins coming out these days look very crude, the Pocahontas dollar, the new president dollars, the reinterpretation of the buffalo nickel for the gold coins, etc. we don&#039;t see anything like the seated or standing liberty designs, poor details, poor realistic likenesses are commonplace today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does coin design seem like it&#8217;s a lost art, the new coins coming out these days look very crude, the Pocahontas dollar, the new president dollars, the reinterpretation of the buffalo nickel for the gold coins, etc. we don&#8217;t see anything like the seated or standing liberty designs, poor details, poor realistic likenesses are commonplace today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

