Comments on: Commentary: Thoughts on the PCGS Lawsuit Against Coin Doctors

By: John

John — Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:06:13 +0000

PCGS/NGC would not have graded these coins had they not been sent in under an Authorized Dealer account. The case against the coin doctors was thrown out of court was it not? How about writing an article on a person who inherited a large MS Walker, Saint Gaudens..etc..etc Raw Collection, made sumbissions under a collector society account. Sold a few coins to Authorized Dealers, whom in turn resubmitted and had them valued at 10-20 times the value given a collector submission.

The bias that exists in thrid party grading between collector submissions and dealer submissions is disgusting and border line consumer fraud. It’s amazing how the manipulation of the word subjective has created one of the biggest legalized ponzi operations in US history. But all good things must come to an end……

By: Jim Williams

Jim Williams — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:33:08 +0000

…sounds like S & P, Moodys , Fitch finding the Banks as the responsible party in asking that the financial offering be rated. Why hold ones self as the final word on grading , and not be on top of the problems ?

By: John Hess

John Hess — Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:27:09 +0000

You go girl!! Keep up your hard-hitting efforts at downing fraud in the business. Your voice stands out and is of great value. Good on ya.