<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/abc" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designs for Guam quarter now online</title>
	<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/general-collecting/designs-for-guam-quarter-now-online/</link>
	<description>Rare Coins &#038; Currency News for Numismatic Collectors - Updated Daily</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio A. Aquiningoc</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/general-collecting/designs-for-guam-quarter-now-online/#comment-14970</link>
		<author>Antonio A. Aquiningoc</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.coinlink.com/News/general-collecting/designs-for-guam-quarter-now-online/#comment-14970</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen/Ladies, the design for the GUAM quarter looks great, except for one, and that is the word GUAHAN. We grew up knowing GUAM as GUAM and that is the way it should be kept. This thing about bringing back history is obsurd. So, please discontinue calling GUAM, GUAHAN because that is a historical thing and should be buried as a dead issue. I know that it was brought up by our SAIPANESE neighbors, but we are GUAMANIANS and we are known in the USA as GUAM and we should keep it like that. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen/Ladies, the design for the GUAM quarter looks great, except for one, and that is the word GUAHAN. We grew up knowing GUAM as GUAM and that is the way it should be kept. This thing about bringing back history is obsurd. So, please discontinue calling GUAM, GUAHAN because that is a historical thing and should be buried as a dead issue. I know that it was brought up by our SAIPANESE neighbors, but we are GUAMANIANS and we are known in the USA as GUAM and we should keep it like that. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
