<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee Meets September 25</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/citizens-coinage-advisory-committee-meets-september-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/citizens-coinage-advisory-committee-meets-september-25/</link>
	<description>Rare Coins &#038; Currency News for Numismatic Collectors - Updated Daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas W. Harms</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/citizens-coinage-advisory-committee-meets-september-25/comment-page-1/#comment-70846</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas W. Harms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/citizens-coinage-advisory-committee-meets-september-25/#comment-70846</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m allowed to send in an idea for review,  I have one you might consider.  Since 1890, coin designs have been mandated to be at least 25-years old before changing.  As you know, sometimes they aren&#039;t allowed to finish out their 25 years. (example: Franklin Halves)
   Why not let them finish out their term as an annual proof?  You wouldn&#039;t need to use a precious metal.  Something like cupro-nickel would do.  You could even out-source the mintmark, say an &quot;O&quot; for New Orleans or a &quot;CC&quot; for Carson City, put that on the coin to make it distinctive, for collectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m allowed to send in an idea for review,  I have one you might consider.  Since 1890, coin designs have been mandated to be at least 25-years old before changing.  As you know, sometimes they aren&#8217;t allowed to finish out their 25 years. (example: Franklin Halves)<br />
   Why not let them finish out their term as an annual proof?  You wouldn&#8217;t need to use a precious metal.  Something like cupro-nickel would do.  You could even out-source the mintmark, say an &#8220;O&#8221; for New Orleans or a &#8220;CC&#8221; for Carson City, put that on the coin to make it distinctive, for collectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

