<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it an Error Coin or a Variety?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/is-it-an-error-coin-or-a-variety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/is-it-an-error-coin-or-a-variety/</link>
	<description>Rare Coins &#038; Currency News for Numismatic Collectors - Updated Daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Riechers</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/is-it-an-error-coin-or-a-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-252263</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Riechers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinlink.com/News/?p=3488#comment-252263</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to show a vote of concurrence to Ken&#039;s position on these matters.  It seems to me that to debate these matters is futile, and I&#039;m thankful for folks like Ken who are willing to evaluate, identify, and catalog the varieties and errors (and I&#039;ve collected both) - so the numismatic community can judge for themselves what&#039;s relevant and collectable.

Like antiques, one persons junk is another persons treasure.

For me, I call them the fun coins.  Some of them (like the accented hair of the 1964 Kennedy half) have an interesting story to go with it.  Some are just interesting to look at and identify the cause.  Some are too expensive because everyone else feels the same way and there aren&#039;t enough to go around (but fortunately there&#039;s many more that have been identified and are still at reasonable prices, thanks to folks like Ken).  It&#039;s also why I look at my change every now and again, or occasionally grade a roll of coins, to see if I lucked out (and it does happen) and can find something interesting (like I used to do when I was a kid and just beginning to collect coins).

Our hobby is indeed diverse.  From five-ounce silver quarters, to territorial gold, to patterns, tokens, medals, and over a hundred years of Lincoln cents and much more.  Who can possibly and authoritatively define what&#039;s collectable - only the collecting community at-large can answer this (and they do - they vote with their limited funds for purchase).

Thanks Ken, and to all of you who help to show the diversity within our hobby and what&#039;s available for those who have an interest in these aspects of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to show a vote of concurrence to Ken&#8217;s position on these matters.  It seems to me that to debate these matters is futile, and I&#8217;m thankful for folks like Ken who are willing to evaluate, identify, and catalog the varieties and errors (and I&#8217;ve collected both) &#8211; so the numismatic community can judge for themselves what&#8217;s relevant and collectable.</p>
<p>Like antiques, one persons junk is another persons treasure.</p>
<p>For me, I call them the fun coins.  Some of them (like the accented hair of the 1964 Kennedy half) have an interesting story to go with it.  Some are just interesting to look at and identify the cause.  Some are too expensive because everyone else feels the same way and there aren&#8217;t enough to go around (but fortunately there&#8217;s many more that have been identified and are still at reasonable prices, thanks to folks like Ken).  It&#8217;s also why I look at my change every now and again, or occasionally grade a roll of coins, to see if I lucked out (and it does happen) and can find something interesting (like I used to do when I was a kid and just beginning to collect coins).</p>
<p>Our hobby is indeed diverse.  From five-ounce silver quarters, to territorial gold, to patterns, tokens, medals, and over a hundred years of Lincoln cents and much more.  Who can possibly and authoritatively define what&#8217;s collectable &#8211; only the collecting community at-large can answer this (and they do &#8211; they vote with their limited funds for purchase).</p>
<p>Thanks Ken, and to all of you who help to show the diversity within our hobby and what&#8217;s available for those who have an interest in these aspects of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.coinlink.com/News/us-coins/is-it-an-error-coin-or-a-variety/comment-page-1/#comment-138150</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinlink.com/News/?p=3488#comment-138150</guid>
		<description>well to me i think it is time all varieties start getting reconition as some sort of Error coin,to many are staying in circulation and losing the grade,it would Boom the Error coin market with High grade machine strikes no doubt,Thanks Coinsguy2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well to me i think it is time all varieties start getting reconition as some sort of Error coin,to many are staying in circulation and losing the grade,it would Boom the Error coin market with High grade machine strikes no doubt,Thanks Coinsguy2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

