Image
& Republican SovereigntyNegotiating the numismatic iconography
of the Early American republic
ANA JOURNAL - By DOUGLAS MUDD.
TThe
premise of this paper is that there was a debate among the Founding Fathers
about what images were appropriate to use as representations of the new country
on its money, and the form this money was to take.

This debate continued from the period of the Revolution
right on through the early years of the Republic and reflected the larger
issues of creating a new nation. This paper explores the subject through
Congressional records, private correspondences, coinage and paper money of the
period, and the Constitution, and will combine a political and economic
approach to the questions posed.
It is part of the interest of coins that
they reflect so much of the age and civilization which made them.
The numismatic history of the
Confederation in many ways mirrors the political history of the period. A weak
federal government shared coining powers with semi-independent states, without
the power to suppress private importation and counterfeiting of token coins
(copper pieces used as small change).
National imagery based on
classical themes eventually prevailed over those selected by the various states
for their coinages, partly as a result of the need to form a clear break with
the past

the
forms and images of the Revolution and Confederation were discredited as a
result of hyperinflation, massive counterfeiting and economic
depression.
This situation resulted in economic chaos, which, when
combined with the political turmoil of the time, clearly pointed to the need
for changea need to create a national identity. This chaos clearly
pointed out the necessity for a more powerful central government and a single,
national coinageas was outlined in the new Constitution.